Sounds weird, Kryo widely used. What do you mean by "slow"? 2016-01-05 22:22 GMT+01:00 Kashyap Mhaisekar <[email protected]>:
> Serega, > Kryo has helped, but it is slow. thanks for the pointer. Will need to look > into this more. > > Thanks > Kashyap > On Jan 4, 2016 4:14 AM, "Serega Sheypak" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Why not to switch to Kryo serialization or any other advanced >> serializers? Express googling give nice example: >> http://henning.kropponline.de/2015/09/27/storm-serialization-with-avro-using-kryo-serializer/ >> >> 2016-01-04 5:29 GMT+01:00 Kashyap Mhaisekar <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> I was trying out gson in Storm and find that parsing is slow for my use >>> case. This is not related to Storm per se, but I guess many of you may have >>> experienced the use case below. If so, an interested in finding out your >>> approach. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Kashyap >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Kashyap Mhaisekar" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Jan 3, 2016 3:55 AM >>> Subject: [google-gson:2550]: JsonElement implements Serialization >>> To: "google-gson" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Is there any way the JsonElement (Specifically JsonPrimitive) can be >>> made serializable? I plan to persist the JsonPrimitive itself as an object >>> in cache so that my further process is easier. Am presently seeing that >>> parsing strings each time is becoming expensive in my use case. >>> >>> Did anyone try and succeed to Serialize a JsonElement (JsonPrimitive)? >>> >>> Please respond. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Kashyap >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "google-gson" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-gson. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >>
