Hi, I am know evaluation some technologies, like classic JMS, Samza etc. Therefore I was bench-marking in local mode, as it was the fastest way to do it. Also I would have expected that it should be close to a production system running on one node, as you don't have network overhead etc...
>Storm itself is benchmarked at > 1 million tuples per second per node. Yes, I remember seeing that, but I didn't see any comments with regards to the hardware the used. Cheers, Klaus On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jon Logan <jmlo...@buffalo.edu> wrote: > Why would you benchmark local mode? It's intended for debugging and > development purposes, not actual production use............... > > > per the website, Storm itself is benchmarked at > 1 million tuples per > second per node. > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho < > klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> how is the performance of a real cluster compared to a local development >> cluster? I was trying to benchmark Storm now and found that it only >> manages to consume 10 events per second in a simple topology which only >> consists out of i spout and one bolt where the spout creates random objects >> and the bolt acknowledge the tuple. >> >> 10 events terrible slow, and I am not sure if this is related to the >> develop mode. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Klaus >> > >
