Hello! Any improvements regarding the performance that could handle the load related on https://www.loggly.com/blog/what-we-learned-about-scaling-with-apache-storm/ and also on https://developer.ibm.com/streamsdev/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2014/04/Streams-and-Storm-April-2014-Final.pdf ?
I look forward for any progress on this performance subject. Best regards, Florin On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Parth Brahmbhatt < pbrahmbh...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > I agree with the version bump and also with the strategy to have a beta > release. > > Thanks > Parth > — > Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Derek Dagit <der...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >> I am supportive. >> >> I think it makes sense to move to 0.10.0 because of the significance of >> the changes. >> -- >> Derek >> >> On 8/28/14, 15:34, P.Taylor Goetz wrote: >> > I’d like to gather community feedback for the next two releases of >> Apache Storm. >> > >> > 0.9.3-incubating will be our next release. Please indicate (by JIRA >> ticket ID) which bug fixes and/or new features you would like to be >> considered for inclusion in the next release. If there is not an existing >> for a particular issue or feature, please consider adding one. >> > >> > For the next and subsequent releases, we will be using a slightly >> different approach than what we did in the past. Instead of voting right >> away on a build, we will make one or more “unofficial” release candidate >> builds available prior to voting on an official release. This will give the >> Apache Storm community more time to discuss, evaluate, identify and fix >> potential issues before the official release. This should enable us to >> ensure the final release is as bug free as possible. >> > >> > Apache Storm 0.10.0 (STORM-216) >> > As some of you are aware, the engineering team at Yahoo! has done a lot >> of work to bring security and multi-tenancy to Storm, and has contributed >> that work back to the community. Over the past few months we have been in >> the process of enhancing and syncing that work with the master branch in a >> separate branch labeled “security.” That work is now nearing completion, >> and I would like us to consider merging it into master after the 0.9.3 >> release. Since the security work includes a large number of changes and >> enhancements, I propose we bump the version number to 0.10.0 for the first >> release to include those features. >> > >> > More information about the security branch can be found in this pull >> request [1], as well as the SECURITY.md file in the security branch [2]. I >> also discussed it in a blog post [3] on the Hortonworks website. Please >> feel free to direct any comments or questions about the security branch to >> the mailing list. >> > >> > Similar to the process we’ll follow for 0.9.3, we plan to make several >> unofficial “development” builds available for those who would like to help >> with testing the new security features. >> > >> > >> > -Taylor >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/pull/121 >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/blob/security/SECURITY.md >> > [3] http://hortonworks.com/blog/the-future-of-apache-storm/ >> > >> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
