Where does Struts-Faces fit into this picture? It is getting quite complicated to make decisions now.
sandeep -----Original Message----- From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:33 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: newbie struts-el best practices question David, I think the consensus is to utilize standards where possible; next use common (open source/vendor); otherwise proprietary tags (role your own). JSTL ==> Struts-EL tags ==> Struts tags ==> common/vendor library tags ==> role your own tags So your application may end up using a combination there of. robert > -----Original Message----- > From: David Neiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:52 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: newbie struts-el best practices question > > > Hello. > > I'm fairly new to struts and getting my feet wet working on a couple of > applications. > In my JSP's I'm using a combination of JSTL tags as well as struts tags. > I've run into several "gotcha's" given that the JSTL tags use the EL ${...} > syntax for attribute values whereas the struts tags do not. > > My question is whether or not I should use the struts-el tags where they > exist in place of the original struts tags. Would this be considered a "best > practice"? Is it just a matter of personal preference? It seems the > struts-el tags are new port from the original. Are they as stable as the > original struts tags? > > Thanks in advance, > David > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
