Do you understand /why/ we're saying it? IMO it'd be beneficial to understand why you're seeing a "change" in behavior.
Dave On Jul 12, 2011 1:17 PM, "Emi Lu" <em...@encs.concordia.ca> wrote: > Thank you for all inputs! All right, I will have to change my codes. > > Emi > > > On 07/12/2011 12:57 PM, stanl...@gmail.com wrote: >> Dave is right Emi. I have been working with other frameworks recently, and >> what Struts/2 needs is a simple FlashScope that allows a request to last two >> life-cycles. However, unless you were doing something OOTO, a request in >> Struts/2 lasts for one reqest/response trip. >> >> Peace, >> Scott >> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Dave Newton<davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Emi Lu wrote: >>>>> Because it's a redirect, and things in the request go away when >>>>> there's a new request. >>>> Not true for previous version. >>> >>> Previous version had a bug, then, because by default, anything >>> relating to an action's instantiation should go away during a >>> redirect--that's kind of the point of instantiating an >>> action-per-request. >>> >>> Again, the only way this *should* be possible is by (incorrectly, IMO) >>> using singleton actions (Bad Idea) or a scope intereptor (or >>> equivalent). Are you using Spring? >>> >>> Please zip up a (maven-ized) minimal example showing the behavior; >>> I'll change the S2 version to the two you mention and debug >>> this--messages should *not* persist between requests. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Emi Lu, ENCS, Concordia University, Montreal H3G 1M8 > em...@encs.concordia.ca +1 514 848-2424 x5884 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >
