Maurizio, tried your way and no joy. Looks like I'll go with Łukasz' way.
Thanks everyone for your consideration and help!
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>wrote:
> 2012/11/30 Eric Lentz <ericle...@outfastsource.com>:
> > Inside of an interceptor, I'd like to add a value onto the the
> ValueStack.
> > What is the best way to do this?
> >
> > I tried this:
> > invocation.getStack().set("myValueStackName", theValueIwantForThisName);
> >
> > But that pushes that value to the top of the stack, pushing my action
> class
> > down which becomes problematic for values getting assigned to the action
> > class. For example, a JSP field with name="fooId" and an action class
> with
> > a field of Long fooId. When I have the above code, fooId doesn't get
> > assigned. When I don't, it works as you would expect.
>
> use stack.pop() and stack.push()
>
> > I guess my interceptor could be later in the stack of interceptors, after
> > the ParametersInterceptor, but that seems fragile. Some other developer
> > could come along and move it and now there are bugs. Plus, I'd prefer
> this
> > particular interceptor be at or near the beginning of the list of
> > interceptors.
> >
> > So, how do I assign, but leave the action class at the top of the stack?
> I
> > could pop the action, add my value and then add the action back on, but
> is
> > there a better way?
>
> No, this is the preferred way. And please keep in mind the stack will
> be searched from top to down for given value name.
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>
