I think what James meant is that commits count for more than opinions ... but maybe I misunderstood him.
... which is nothing more than a restatement of what Ted always says about us voting by lazy consensus (griping or not griping about the direction a person's commits are taking things). On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:00:00 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, again, James, > I hope I don't read you wrong, James, but you seem to be saying that > you belong to one group (the important one) and I belong to another > group (the unimportant one) and that "it" (Clinton comes to mind) is > less about the unimportant ones (me) and more about the important ones > (you)? Is that the point? If not, what is? -- Eddie Bush Thank you for removing unnecessary dialog when posting a response! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
