Oh, that is sweet!  I was totally unaware of that.  Thanks Martin!

-- 
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com

On Fri, March 18, 2005 11:52 am, Martin Wegner said:
>
> You can also use the Jakarta Commons ID packageto generate a GUID which is
> guaranteed to be unique in the universe.  You could then convert the GUID
> to your seed.
>
>
>
> --- Kris Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will InetAddress.getLocalHost() work for you?
>> NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces() might also be of interest. Or,
>> you
>> might want to create yourself an instance of java.rmi.dgc.VMID...
>>
>> Quoting "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> > Oh boy, I got a good one!  It's only related to Struts in that the
>> > application in question is Struts-based, so I hope no one minds a
>> semi-OT
>> > question...
>> >
>> > Here's the situation... An app I wrote has a daemon thread that is
>> spawned
>> > at startup (from a Struts plugin) that does periodic background
>> processing
>> > tasks.  This works great, never had a bit of trouble.
>> >
>> > Now though, the app is moving from a single server to a clusted
>> environment.
>> >
>> > So, what's going to happen is that each server in the cluster will
>> have
>> > its own instance of the thread running on it.  Not a huge problem
>> except
>> > that I have to be sure only one instance of the thread (i.e., one
>> server
>> > in the cluster) is executing concurrently.
>> >
>> > The easy solution is just a database table that is checked when the
>> thread
>> > wakes up.  If there is no entry in it, then there is no other instance
>> > running, so it can write an entry to the table and go off and do its
>> > thing.
>> >
>> > I want to be extremely certain that no issues arise in terms of one
>> > instance of the thread reading from the database while another
>> instance is
>> > writing, etc.  So, aside from transactional database calls and
>> row-level
>> > locking, I want to do one more thing: I want the thread to sleep a
>> random
>> > number of seconds (1-300) at startup.  This will ensure that, all the
>> > database locking and such aside, the threads should all be offset from
>> one
>> > another in terms of when they run.
>> >
>> > So, I need a random number generated when the thread starts up.  As we
>> all
>> > know though, random number generation on most computers that don't
>> have
>> > something like a Brownian motion sensor attached stuck in a cup of
>> boiling
>> > coffee can't generate truly random numbers.  So, in theory, what could
>> > happen is that if all the servers in the cluster come up at the same
>> time,
>> > the threads could wind up running at the same time regardless of the
>> > random sleep at the start!  It might never happen in reality, small
>> > fluctuations would probably offset them anyway, but I want to be more
>> > certain than that.
>> >
>> > So now we're at the crux of the problem...
>> >
>> > I can't just seed the random number generator with the current time
>> > because it concievably might not be random enough.  So, I thought I
>> could
>> > just tally up the octets of the server's IP address and add that to
>> the
>> > current time.  Then the seed on each server should be different
>> enough.
>> >
>> > But, there doesn't appear to be any way to get the server IP address
>> > independant of a request, so I can't get at it in my plugin.  Anyone
>> know
>> > differently?
>> >
>> > Assuming that is the case, can anyone think of any other way to seed
>> the
>> > generator that would ensure a different value on different machines in
>> the
>> > cluster?  There are some options like encoding the individual server
>> names
>> > in my app's config file with a different seed value for each, but that
>> > makes maintenance a pain if a new server is added or one removed or
>> > addresses simply changed.
>> >
>> > Any ideas?  Thanks!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Frank W. Zammetti
>> > Founder and Chief Software Architect
>> > Omnytex Technologies
>> > http://www.omnytex.com
>>
>> --
>> Kris Schneider <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> D.O.Tech       <http://www.dotech.com/>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to