I believe that if you are using JSP includes, the included file, "looses" any objects that were put in using request.setAttribute(...) ? I have found that using jsp:includes is typicaly good enough to include any group page imports, definitions and maybe any JavaScript...
Regards, Alex. On 6/30/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Bill Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Tiles is very powerful but I've found that 99% of the time I'm only > using > > it to wrap a page in a consistent layout/navigation. It seems like I'm > > not getting enough value out of it to justify the additional layer of > > indirection of having to touch tiles-defs.xml. I also would love to be > > able to include header/footer pages from another webapp context. > > What about plain-old jsp includes? Maybe they're "enough" for your needs. > > And, tiles-defs.xml is optional-- you can use the Tiles tags directly in > the > page. See if this helps: > http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/excerpt/progjakstruts_14/index4.html > > -- > Wendy Smoak > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
