If the title confuses, then that was the point. I've been training up some developers to use Struts and the common complaint is the ambiguity of the Action definition's attribute attribute. Now we all have off days when it comes to naming properties/methods etc, but this seems very ambiguous. Some see it to mean you can use an attribute of the Action, some just plain don't get it at all (eyes were raised). Could I make a suggestion that this is renamed to something more appropriate like aliasName, referenceName or formName?
We are using 1.2.4, so if it has changed in anything 1.2.4+, I apologise. Cheers Christopher Marsh-Bourdon www.marsh-bourdon.com ------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. 3167 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]