>Hi Guys:
>
>I am evaluvating Shale for upcoming project. I wanted to use HTML rather
>than JSP like Tapestry. I just want to know what you guys think about Clay
>and Facelets. One thing I liked about Facelets is it doesnt need any extra
>xml file to define jsf components .
This is also true for clay HTML templating (as of 09-19). For example:
<span jsfid="loadBundle" var="messages" basename="com.acme.mywidgets" />
<table>
<tr>
<td>
#{messages.city}:
<td>
<span jsfid="outputText" id="city"
value="#{managed-bean-name.city}" size=25/> or
<input id="city" type=text value="#{managed-bean-name.city}"
size=25/> (assumed mapping to outputText)
</table>
<input id="submit" type="submit" value="#{messages.save}"
action="#{managed-bean-name.save}" >
The HTML attributes are passed thru to the component values. The attributes
that are passed thru are defined in the default clay config file found under
META-INF of the clay jar.
I was thinking about creating a third rolodex example that used this method.
Gary
>Rgds,
>--Siva Jagadeesan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]