The point, Preston, is that I can only understand what you say. If you mean something different than what you say, then understanding you becomes a tad difficult. When you say "x" and someone says "not-x", then you say that you meant "y" and that it is "pedantic" to stick you with meaning x just because you said "x". This sort of rough speech indicates a lack of knowledge about the terms and the subject-matter. That is okay, unless you want to pretend otherwise by switching to "y", then "z", then, who knows (?) maybe "42"? This is not a "koffee klatch" where the girls can say whatever they like. This is a professional forum and presumably it is okay to ask the participants to make sense without being pedantic.
On 12/13/05, Preston Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Dakota Jack wrote: > > > And, Josh, last time I looked JSP was not on the list we are talking > about. > > So, what was your point? > > The point is you're being pedantic. I wasn't describing the entirety of > J2EE or even the implementation. Rather the tools, frameworks, etc. used > to build J2EE apps. > > Preston > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
