On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 08:47 -0800, Dakota Jack wrote: > You originally said that your list was the virtual core of J2EE. That's
No. I never said "virtual core". > what you said. You call someone a pedant when you want to demean something > they taught you. Anyway, for your "pedantic" purposes: Or when they're being pedantic. Here is what I said, exactly. "I would argue that with Java (J2EE specifically) "standards" have largely just "emerged". Think of all the examples. Tomcat Ant Struts JUnit Hibernate That's, by and large, the "standard" J2EE toolkit. And by that I mean that while we may have WebSphere, Tapestry, Maven, EJBs, etc. there's a certain concensus out there and the tools in the first list are what have the mindshare now." I never said THAT was J2EE. I never said THAT was the reference implementation of J2EE. I said that's the standard toolkit. i.e The tools used to do J2EE development. I really don't see what is wrong with what I said that you would take things this far. What is your deal? > This is not difficult, but it is not Hiberate, Struts, etc. either. If you > think this is "pedantic", perhaps I should point out that the whole trouble > here is based on your sweet sciolism. You are right, we would not work well > together. I am far too "pedantic" to work with anyone stuck on sciolism for > effect. ?????? I was talking about what I believed to be the standard toolkit for doing J2EE development. And you've been jack-hammering me over the head post after post after post for saying that. I don't get it. Seriously. Preston --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
