LOL Okay, Big Fella, stand at ease. If what you said does not suggest what I said, then you are safe as barrel water.
Let me state it for myself. It is clearly POOR and has been for a long time. If people are too danged sensitive to accept that, sobeit. Yesterday is gone. I am not writing history but am writing and designing code. To heck with the ego parade. <snip> On 1/6/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This has been, in my opinion, the biggest downfall of Struts. As you > > suggested, Frank, the whole way the view state is taken care of by > Struts > > is > > poor. > > Woah, hold on now, don't put words in my mouth :) I wouldn't go so far as > to say it's poor because many people have had a great deal of success with > it. I *do* think there are some shortcomings that may or may not have > some relatively simple solutions, and I don't think too many people would > disagree. No one thinks Struts is perfect, but based on how many people > use it and use it successfully, it's probably not fair to say it's poor, > or that any one part of it is poor. > > Frank </snip> -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
