What's wrong with the implementation?
And, if it took my replacement a week to figure that out, I would hope
he'd have a replacement shortly thereafter :)
Frank
Josh McDonald wrote:
It's not the idea we're objecting to so much as the suggested
implementation.
But the problem is no matter how nice your implementation is, you've
still got to maintain a list of "allowed" classes, which is fine for
you. Unfortunately when you've moved interstate, and your replacement's
replacement adds a class to the package full of "allowed" classes, and
it takes him a week to figure out what the bejesus you did.
-Josh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]