Very interesting numbers, please allow me a question, you have only 43 lines of java code in your application, but 1107 lines ruby code... but are talking about smaller code base with ror? :-)
leon On 2/21/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leon Rosenberg wrote: > > A pretty simple document management system, for a small intranet, I'm > > sure a typical application. It contains view and edit interfaces, > > in the edit interface you can manage document vendors, document type > > (like manual, presentation, advertisement material and so), and you > > can upload document and assign properties to it: the type of the > > document, the vendor of the document and some description. The access > > is limited to restricted users. > > > If I have time in the next day or two I'll just do it and see. Without > making the UI pretty I'd say we're talking 15-30 minutes, but that's > assuming you don't have user access code that already exists. > > The unit and functional tests that RoR creates for you would not fully > exercise the system; if you added on another 30 minutes you could have > very broad coverage. > > In the view interface you are able to select documents by type, or > > vendor or type and vendor, or get the full list. The view interface > > can be seen under http://www2.anotheria.net/konet/cms/showPage? > > > The view side would take longer because I don't know Russian ;) > > The search part by itself would be about 5-10 minutes. > > http://www.italiannewjersey.com/ is a site that I _re_wrote using RoR as > an experiment. I duplicated and extended the functionality in under 4 > hours, including reproducing the style/layout/etc. and breaking up the > presentation side into more manageable chunks. (RoR has "custom tags" > but they're called "partials", as in a "partial template". Using them in > an RHTML (our JSP) is still inside a scriptlet :( > > The vast majority of my time (about 3 hrs) was spent within the view > side, as the source HTML was really crappy. Also, I had a working > implementation to code from; if I had done it from scratch the view side > would have taken me much longer as I really suck at design. > > There are some sections to the site that are not dynamic that should be; > as an experiment I converted one static section to being dynamic and it > took approximately 10 minutes without unit/functional tests. > > Also, it was my first "real" RoR application; a more knowledgeable RoR > person would probably have been quicker. I am _far_ from an expert at > RoR, but I get by. > > I've attempted to append a chunk of a comparison spreadsheet I made up; > I doubt the formatting will work well so I apologize in advance. > > Caveats: > - The J2EE version uses some weird older stuff the original app > designers used, so the numbers may be inflated about 2-5% > - The J2EE version includes no unit or functional tests; the RoR version > has minimal tests (I have numbers for both) > - The J2EE JavaScript includes a complete WYSIWIG HTML editor, the RoR > version includes the complete prototype.js library which is not used. > - The RoR version includes functionality not present in the J2EE > version: three static sections were converted to dynamic (including the > admin side) and there are more games being played with dynamic content > inside the pages. > > HTH, > Dave > > > > Lines Words Chars > J2EE > JSP 1775 6205 59142 > JAVA 43 123 1561 > HTM 106 413 4715 > SHTML 1703 8305 93937 > TEM 718 2201 28420 > XML 17 26 619 > JS 4868 17325 161706 > Total 9230 34598 350100 > Total-JS 4362 17273 188394 > > > > > RoR > RB 1107 2884 28196 > RHTML 998 4440 44158 > YML 40 107 927 > JS 3958 10851 126538 > Total 6103 18282 199819 > Total-JS 2145 7431 73281 > Total-JS-Test 1600 6182 60130 > Total-JS-Test-Helpers 1579 6137 59743 > > > > > RoR % of J2EE (All) 66% 53% 57% > RoR % of J2EE (Just App) 36% 36% 32% > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
