On 3/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/14/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dakota Jack wrote: > > > For my part, I have to disagree with Frank. JSF has been around forever > > and > > > has no discernable traction. Perhaps that is the reason Craig is a > > little > > > testy nowadays. I don't know about that. > > > > I don't think it's fair to say it has no discernible traction. I > > *would* however agree that it hasn't gotten the traction that was hoped > > for. In either case, I for one am not sure at what point it is > > reasonable to completely dismiss something because it hasn't yet reached > > the top of the hill... > > > Please try these opinions out on the MyFaces crowd :-). In case you didn't > know, that is an *Apache* project to produce an *Apache licensed* > implementation of JSF, along with some cool components that conform to the > spec. Popularity is growing like wildfire -- and that was already true even > before the ADF Faces contribution that recently entered the Apache > Incubator. > > Last time I looked, MyFaces has more active committers than Struts does > (action framework and Shale folks combined), and *lots* more commit > activity, if that is your criteria for success. (In case you are wondering, > it's not mine). > > Craig
So why again MyFaces is not under Struts umbrella while Shale is? Michael. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
