Well, you managed to avoid the whole issue again, Raeburn. Do you ever address a topic?
On 3/25/06, Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I normally ignore your crap and I'm sorry for prolonging this agony for > everyone. This really will be my last word. > > Michael, why do you continue to waste your time on such a "big pile of > crap" as Struts? What kind of a fool must you be for using the world's > worst web framework, run by a bunch on idiotic dictators? If you really > believe that, then you are as big a loser as you appear to be. If you > think you can do better, then fine, go do it. But please, quit whining > and doing nothing about it. Or do you just enjoy whining? > > Please. Get a life. > > Steve > > p.s. Don't bother addressing any reply to me. You'll just be pissing in > the wind. > > Dakota Jack wrote: > > The fact is that there will not be an explanation for this > failure. While > > sitting in the biggest pile of crap code one could imagine, they > continue to > > extoll their virtues as if they were about to be mentioned for an > honorarium > > in computer history. > > > > <snip> > > On 3/24/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Steve Raeburn wrote: > >> > >>> Bottom line is that this is the way Apache works and it's not going to > >>> change. > >>> > >> In any case, it is not a subject of legitimate debate at this point > that > >> progress on the Struts framework stagnated. If you guys were doing > >> everything right, then what is your explanation for that? > >> > >> Jonathan Revusky > >> > > > > </snip> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its > back." > > ~Dakota Jack~ > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
