You are welcome.
I want to say some more here:
1, if your project does not experience any bugs that has been reported for
2.0.1, it is not urgent to upgrade to another beta release.
2, if you need a demo to show to customer, I will suggest you to upgrade
because the 2.0.5 use new dojo version and it has some cool features. For
example, even there are some bugs reported for new datetimepicker tag, I
will still want to it.
3, Anyway, you should try the new version personally because it is the
direction but maybe not in the project. Our testing can help to let the GA
release comes earlier:)

Regards,

Zheng Shuai

On 2/14/07, walidito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Thanks shuai for yoyr response,
I think I'd better wait for next releases (or for a GA release, if this
happens one day I hope).
thanks.


Shuai Zheng wrote:
>
> Based on my own experience, WW-1711 is a big issue.
> I know there is a way to walk around it, but I feel it makes the code
ugly
> and it is strange to put extra code there (select tag is popular and
shown
> all pages. Also it is strange that a string will be used as the value of
> select, in most of cases, a value of select will be integer, isn't it?).
>
> I am sad to hear that it will not be fixed in 2.0.6 and there is not
this
> issue in previous release. In my experience, a new bug comes with a new
> release should be easy to solve, but maybe I am not correct.
>
> Anyway, 2.0.5 is a good job. Based on my own experience, it is more
stable
> and faster than 2.0.1. For myself, the only reason I don't upgrade
because
> I
> don't want my team to change the code again and again.
>
> May I know when the GA release will come out? It looks like we need to
> wait
> another 2 weeks.
>
> When everytime a new release comes out(even still a beta), a new
> *-all.zipshould be released for downloading. This will attract more
> people to use it
> and this means more people will help to test it. As you see, there are
> lots
> of people, including me, don't want to use a jar which is compiled by
> ourselves (because we can't take too much risk in the project, using a
> beta
> version is already a risk, we can't afford more).
>
> Regards,
>
> Zheng Shuai
>
> On 2/14/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/13/07, Shuai Zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I will suggest you to wait for the next release, because there are
>> really
>> > some critical bugs in the 2.0.5 (especially the bug on select tag).
>>
>> If you mean not being able to select non-string types, the only fix
>> we've had so far breaks a lot of the tests,
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1711
>>
>> so we haven't applied it to 2.0.6 yet (just the head, which is tagged
>> 2.1.x now).
>>
>> If you know of other critical issues, be sure that they have been
>> reported through JIRA for 2.0.6. If a problem isn't listed in JIRA,
>> then we don't know it exists :)
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Migrate-from-Struts-2.0.1-to-2.0.5-tf3221136.html#a8966503
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to