No - what I said was that I would be surprised if the <s:form> s2 tag
DOES NOT generate a HTML <form> tag. This was in response to your
comment "Also, is counter-intuitive for html users that a <s:form>
actually renders a table, instead of simply render a <form> tag" - which
implies that no HTML <form> tag is generated for the s2 <s:form> tag.
/Ian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is crazy! Are you suggesting that maybe a FORM tag is written if
you
modify the templates? I would understand if you said maybe there is
not a
FORM tag generated if you DO modify the templates! Any solid framework
should be usable first and modifiable second. Is the framework usable
without
writing framework code first?
Scott
On 3/10/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have to agree with stanlick with this.
>
I would agree more work need to be done.
> I have abandoned in my project the more complex themes of struts and
kept
> it in the "simple" theme (with customized tag templates here and
there)
> because of these "<Table>" tags coming out of nowhere.
> If you imply a deduction that a <s:form> tag implies in the
presence of
a
> <table> and that <s:textfield> are in truth
> <tr><td>[label]</td><td><input type="text" ... </td></tr> i'm imposing
an
> obsolete html table structure to a page. What if I wanted to use <div>
and
> <span> ?
use the xhtml_css theme
> What if I wanted to use a different table structure?
>
Then you have the opportunity to customize each theme to your particular
and specific need
> (two fields inside a simple <td> tag, for instance ?)
> Also, is counter-intuitive for html users that a <s:form> actually
renders
> a table, instead of simply render a <form> tag.
>
I haven't looked lately, but I imagine there is a <form> tag in there
somewhere, otherwise I don't see how it would work. Even in the dojo
theme, I believe the
> As for documentation, I recommend and effort to map the relation
between
> tag x freemarker template so this tag customization becomes easier
without
> having to browse the struts.view.jsp code.
>
Although this would be a worthwhile documentation effort, I'm not
convinced that it is that necessary. Each of the freemarker templates
are named after the tag, and I have never had to look at the tags java
code in order to determine which template is rendered.
>
>
>
> Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 09/03/2007 18:40
> Please respond to
> "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
>
>
> To
> Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Need more comprehensive AJAX Implementation Instructions
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Also, I have yet to see what an Action class might
>> actually look like to handle the asynchronous call.
>>
>
> It looks like any other Action.
>
> (BTW, Tiles is supported in S2 via the Tiles plugin,
> but Tiles 2 is still a bit fluxful.)
>
> d.
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast
> with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
