Stan--
From what I can see use of Object Graph Notational Language allows
Regular Expression evaluations plus 
Lambda Expressions evaluations
http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/ognl.html
HTH,
M--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of 
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information 
that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le 
cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des 
renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le 
destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit 
de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 4:04 PM
Subject: Java-JSP data sharing mechanisms


> When it comes to sharing values between Java and JSP, I see the following
> conventions used
> 
>   1. %foo
>   2. $foo
>   3. #foo
>   4. foo
> 
> Is there a one-stop grid that identifies what each of these symbols
> represent and if/when they are even necessary?  I read about OGNL and how
> prefixing attributes that are to be retrieved from the OG may *not* require
> a special symbol at all.  I understand JSTL and the four scopes
> 
> 
>   1. page
>   2. request
>   3. session
>   4. application
> 
> What is the interplay between stashing objects using Java code and
> subsequent retrieval fromJSP?  Can Java code interact with OGNL?  Are things
> automatically added/removed from the OG?  This is different enough from
> Stuts 1 that it causes confusion.
> 
> -- 
> Scott
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Reply via email to