Dave, I have to disagree with you on customizing the interceptors. It is just sloppy to use a generic stack that calls every interceptor. Important issues also get lost when you do that.
The true issue with Struts2 is the poor documentation. Worst is the fact that some of the defaults just aren't smart. I really wish there was a way to group actions for the purpose of applying default stacks without being forced to define a namespace or overriding the default stack of an existing namespace. newton.dave wrote: > > From: specdev2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> The action validate() method gets called properly by the Workflow >> Interceptor. >> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/workflow-interceptor.html > > > Oh, you're right [for that version of XWork]. > > > You'll need to change that when you upgrade S2, though; current XWork does > not work this way. > > > While I can appreciate the desire to "optimize" your interceptor stacks > you are configuring yourself into a corner and are opening your > application up to potential issues as the framework evolves. > > > IMO it's not worth it. > > > Dave > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-does-one-get-the-%22validate%22-method-to-be-called--tp15160502p15164612.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
