Hi All,
I have tried all the ways but not able to solve the problem..
i am attaching all the codes for my test application..
*StrutsExample.xml*
*
package* aum;
*
import* java.sql.Date;
*
import* com.opensymphony.xwork2.ActionSupport;
**
*public* *class* StrutsExample *extends* ActionSupport {
**
*private* *static* *final* *long* *serialVersionUID* = 1L;
*private* String name="null";
Date date;
*public* Date getDate() {
*return* date;
}
*public* *void* setDate(Date date) {
*this*.date = date;
}
*public* String getName() {
*return* name;
}
*public* *void* setName(String name) {
*this*.name=name;
}
*public* String execute() *throws* Exception{
*return* *SUCCESS*;
}
}
*Struts.xml*
<struts>
<package name="nsolution" extends="struts-default" >
<action name="TestExample" class="aum.StrutsExample">
<result name="input">/jsp/index.jsp</result>
<result name="SUCCESS">/jsp/welcome.jsp</result>
</action>
</package>
</struts>
*Index.jsp*
<s:form action="TestExample">
<s:textfield label="Your Name" name="userName"/>
<s:textfield label="Enter Date" name="date"/>
<s:submit/>
</s:form>
one more interesting thing is that when i click the submitt button it is
displaying the URL as http://aum:8080/StrutsStarter/TestExample where as i
thik it should display it as
http://aum:8080/StrutsStarter/TestExample.action
Any suggestion in this regard will be much appriciated.
On 3/7/08, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm technically a newbie on this, so don't take my word on it, but I
> > would suggest:
> >
> > * Don't use "actionPackages" or the annotations.
>
> Both actionPackages and the annotations work fine; the issue you had was
> that
> you were combining the two configuration methods. There are some
> limitations
> with S2.0's zero-config, most notably no interceptor-ref annotations. That
> may be solvable via @ParentPackage by configuring the interceptors via
> XML,
> however--not sure.
>
> > * Remove the "namespace" attribute on the action element.
>
> I didn't see that in his code; it may have gotten edited out. Normally the
> "namespace" attribute goes with the "package" element, though, and there's
> no
> reason not to have one.
>
> It's one of the major ways to separate parts of the application.
>
> > * Change the "package" attribute on the action element to have a value
> > != your Java package.
>
> Hopefully I (or someone...) will remember to look in to that and nail down
> why that's a possible issue and either document it or fix it.
>
> Dave
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
