60 times slower? I am expecting S2 to be slower that S1 but 60 times sounds weird to me. The other thing that sounds weird is the huge difference between 30 and 60 times.
musachy On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Pierre Thibaudeau <pierre.thibaud...@gmail.com> wrote: > From the comparison I made on my own system, S2 is overall about 30 to > 60 times slower than S1. This is based on comparing a number of pages > (repeatedly, testing with JMeter, etc.); the pages being compared > are, admittedly not 100% identical, but abstracting from the specific > differences, the performance of S2 is still more than one order of > magnitude behind what I had come to expect from S1. > > I don't think I would ever want to go back to S1, given S2's > advantages. But now that we are nearing production, S2's performance > is giving me headaches! > > 2008/12/13 yorlick kilroy wrote: >> The bottleneck is OGNL. >> I replaced the struts2 tags with JSTL Core >> This made loading my jsps almost 20 times faster!!! >> I mainly did this replacing in jsps that produce lots of output. I >> still use struts2 tags in jsps where I process forms and other small >> jsps. > > I am following your lead and reverting to <c:tags>, and even removing > them altogether when the tag merely produces an HTML element such as > <input>---I never use anything but the simple theme, as I rely > entirely on CSS and not on tables. > > Two tags however seem very difficult to avoid: <s:url> and <s:text>. > > <s:text> > My application is entirely i18lized, so I rely heavily on those > resources. Since I use Spring, however, I am very tempted to use > Spring's resources feature and therefore Spring's tags to deal with > it; I have no idea how fast they are, but it can't be worse than > S2s... (Unfortunately, Spring's resources are not customized to S2's > model-driven actions...) That would probably involve an unpleasant > amount of refactorization, but if it's worth it, I'll do it! Any > comment on this? > > <s:url> > That's a tough one. I may have to write my own OGNL-less version of > that tag... Suggestions for a simpler alternative? > > All in all, it seems to me that this performance issue could easily be > the death of S2 (which would be a real shame). Two alternatives > present themselves: > * Making a version of S2 that doesn't necessarily rely on OGNL. > * Making OGNL ten times faster. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
