And *my* point is that perhaps there's another way you can solve your problem and eliminate the "tight" coupling between form and action.
Dave On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:16 AM, aum strut <aum.str...@gmail.com> wrote: > My point was that the boolean approach mentioned in the document was in my > opinion is better and same was mentioned in the > document sinnce it was not coupling the form tightly with action. > > > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:13 AM, aum strut <aum.str...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > agree!!!!! > > > but i still believe coupling the form value with action component is > > never > > > a > > > good idea.. so still believe the first approach was was better. > > > > > > > So... is there another way to achieve what you want? > > > > Dave > > >
