Thanks Timothy,

I was calling tika-server through an ajax call using formdata, so I
couldn't specify the content type (as I know of), but at last I found what
caused it as when I processed RFTs in a command line, they worked fine.

FYI, this is how I call the server as follows:


            $.ajax({
                url: http://localhost:9998/tika/form,
                type: 'POST',
                data: formData,
                dataType: 'json',
                processData: false,
                contentType: false,
            })

Cheers,

Allison


On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <talli...@mitre.org>
wrote:

> This is helpful.  IHow are you calling tika-server?  Are you specifying a
> content-type?
>
>
>
> If I specify type=”application/rtf” or if I don’t specify a type, all is
> good.  However, I get the same stacktrace that you shared if I incorrectly
> specify “application/msword”.
>
>
>
> *From:* Allison A. [mailto:alliso...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 24, 2016 10:39 PM
> *To:* user@tika.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Tika server RTF processing
>
>
>
> Oops, I am re-posting and attaching them. It seems Ajax calls are not
> passed properly.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Allison, Timothy B. <talli...@mitre.org>
> wrote:
>
> There was a bug in some RTF files in 1.13, but that was fixed in 1.14
> (TIKA-1845).  We now have one rtf in our test suite for tika-server.
>
>
>
> If you turn logging on, can you share a stacktrace, or can you share the
> offending file?
>
>
>
> *From:* Allison A. [mailto:alliso...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:00 PM
> *To:* user@tika.apache.org
> *Subject:* Tika server RTF processing
>
>
>
> I am wondering if the RTF parser is working in Tika server 1.13 or 1.14
> via an Ajax call.
>
>
>
> I have tried both versions, but it seems I was not able to pass an Ajax
> call to Tika server, getting the 422 error,unprocessable entity. It worked
> fine with other MS office documents, Word, Excel, etc except RTF.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Allison
>
>
>

Reply via email to