Hi,

For completeness (since I care more about consistent fonts than case)...

Lowercase or not has nothing to do with professionalism. Consider the logos
of amazon, ebay, facebook, flicker, intel, hp, citibank, macy's, bp, sears,
mapquest,xerox, and so on. Many companies have switched to lowercase as
part of modernizing their logos.Why? Because they want to appear more
approachable.

Here's a nice writeup to consider:
http://www.adherecreative.com/blog/bid/181249/The-Case-for-Lower-Case-A-Rebranding-Conundrum

The branding choice isn't about personal preference but rather the
following statement: "At the end of the day, it's not a good idea to stick
to the staple just because that is what you're used to in your industry. If
you want to stand out, you have to break the mold."

You learn something new every day.

Gunnar


On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Carol Pearson <carol.pearson...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 for 13
> +1 for 4g
>
> Don't like the lower case apache trafodion - I'm with Sean on that....
>
> -Carol P.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
> Twitter:  @CarolP222
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Atanu Mishra <atanumis...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I like 12.
>>
>> Atanu
>>
>> ____________________
>> Atanu Mishra
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ken: Can you make a variant of 13 with the same font as we use on the
>>> web site; that is, Telex?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gunnar
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Selva Govindarajan <
>>> selva.govindara...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for 8 and 13.  Consider reducing the space between the fonts if
>>>> possible in 8.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Selva
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, February 13, 2016 4:50 PM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: 答复: 答复: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A new set of Trafodion logo options are attached, taking account of
>>>> much of the input that I received.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One of these is a clear winner for me personally, but I submit them for
>>>> your consideration and hope we can zero in on one of them. (Or perhaps two
>>>> for a run-off.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By the way, all logos use Google fonts, including the earlier front
>>>> runner option 4 where I found a comparable google font to use, now named
>>>> option 4g.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Ken
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Liu, Ming (Ming) <ming....@esgyn.cn>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Gunnar,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can see it now. I like dragon very much, but hope it is not too
>>>> popular.
>>>>
>>>> I think we also think about whale before?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The meaning behind whale is: it is the biggest animal on the earth ,
>>>> and real J
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And Hadoop projects seem to use cute animals (Hive, Hadoop). Maybe we
>>>> can draw a baby dragon?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And most people like sky blue? I used to have black or golden dragon as
>>>> my favorite J
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My 2 cents.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Overall, I like this logo, it is already good enough for me. It shows
>>>> to me how powerful Trafodion is. I know it is hard to get consensus for
>>>> this kind of design.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Ming
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *发件人**:* Gunnar Tapper [mailto:tapper.gun...@gmail.com]
>>>> *发送时间**:* 2016年2月13日 9:43
>>>> *收件人**:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *主**题**:* Re: 答复: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Trying an attachment...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Liu, Ming (Ming) <ming....@esgyn.cn>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Gunnar,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to put the logo as attachment? If they are not too big.
>>>> I saw QiFan once has an attachment of a logo in one of his post. Some
>>>> people cannot access Google drive .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Ming
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *发件人**:* Gunnar Tapper [mailto:tapper.gun...@gmail.com]
>>>> *发送时间**:* 2016年2月13日 4:31
>>>> *收件人**:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *主**题**:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Based on the input from several people in this thread, I'd like to
>>>> propose the following draft as a candidate:
>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxlwNhWxn8iTQV85eDlyc0RxWGc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm hoping that Ken, Sandhya, or someone else can make a real version
>>>> for consideration rather than my PowerPoint hack. It needs a bit of work on
>>>> the gray hue (s;lightly darker IMO), size of dragon, and alignment but
>>>> that's better done in a real designer program. The font was downloaded from
>>>> Google Fonts: Telex Regular.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As mentioned, the draft fits into the overall website well:
>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxlwNhWxn8iTczNMLTRjYUVXSkE and I'm
>>>> sure it'll meet the other criteria, too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gunnar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Carol Pearson <
>>>> carol.pearson...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We also need our logo to look good on our customers' and users' and
>>>> ecosystem denizens' websites so they're eager to show off that Trafodion
>>>> fits into the puzzle ;-) .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't think we're quite converged and ready for a real vote, and to
>>>> be honest, I hate to call for a 3 day vote on this over a long weekend in
>>>> the US and at the end of a holiday week in China since that's where most of
>>>> our traffic comes from.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Further discussion over the weekend and final vote on Tuesday?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Carol P.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Twitter:  @CarolP222
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Venkat Muthuswamy <
>>>> venkat.muthusw...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Having Apache in our logo, brings a lot of credibility and shows we are
>>>> serious.
>>>>
>>>> Let’s also keep in mind that the logo/text should look good on the
>>>> website, presentation slides and any brochures if you will.
>>>>
>>>> Certainly we need multiple colors to bring attention to the product
>>>> name.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Venkat
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Christophe LeRouzo [mailto:c...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 7:59 AM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Cc:* Rohit Jain <rohit.j...@esgyn.com>; Gunnar Tapper <
>>>> tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It seems we might need multiple votes:
>>>>
>>>> -          One color or multiple colors?
>>>>
>>>> -          Thin font or thick font?
>>>>
>>>> -          One font or two fonts?
>>>>
>>>> -          Apache or not…
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What was Selva saying about engineers and votes? J
>>>>
>>>> -clr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Amanda Moran [mailto:amanda.mo...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 7:21 AM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Cc:* Rohit <rohit.j...@esgyn.com>; Gunnar Tapper <
>>>> tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -1 all same color.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I still like option 4 the way it was/is but I can understand wanting to
>>>> remove Apache .... But I still like it the way it is
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 12, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Qifan Chen <qifan.c...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But is it obvious that Trafodion is an Apache project, if one starts to
>>>> read about it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Rohit <rohit.j...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It depends on how much value you think Apache adds to Trafodion, as
>>>> compared to those other logos that perhaps already have some cachet.  I
>>>> feel that it adds quite a bit of value to Trafodion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rohit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>> From: Qifan Chen <qifan.c...@esgyn.com>
>>>> Date: 02/12/2016 8:34 AM (GMT-06:00)
>>>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if we could also consider a mod to option 4 where only the
>>>> dragon and the word trafodion are present. See the two images attached.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I sampled a couple apache project logs and found they do not have the
>>>> word APACHE in their logos (e.g., HIVE, MONGODB, AVRO, SPARK).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With this approach, it is possible to put the Trafodion logo into the
>>>> "power by Apache" logo, see URL here
>>>> <http://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/>, without the duplication
>>>> of "Apache".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It also simplifies the design and allows a good focus.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks --Qifan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Rohit <rohit.j...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Check out the other logos I sent to the internal dlist.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rohit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>> From: Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: 02/12/2016 12:50 AM (GMT-06:00)
>>>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I suggest that we limit the number of colors used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A simple change:
>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxlwNhWxn8iTT3NNMTZ0dmhqQm8
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gunnar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Trina Krug <trina.k...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Option 4!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Trina
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carol Pearson <carol.pearson...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Slightly late to the party, but +1 on option 4 as well.  Though I would
>>>> prefer a slightly less formal font, the one in option 6 is too spaced out
>>>> and I'm not fond of it overall...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But that's really a nit and this is infinitely better than no logo at
>>>> all....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Ken!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Carol P.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Twitter:  @CarolP222
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Neither. Keep the font the same for Apache and Trafodion. Bold them
>>>> both.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan <
>>>> sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we should try and see how lowercase with both placements look.
>>>> The dragon on top looks better to many. We can take votes again J
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Wei-Shiun Tsai [mailto:wei-shiun.t...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:13 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 for Dave’s and Hans’ suggestion.  Like the dragon to sit on the
>>>> right, not on top of Trafodion.  But the font in #4 looks more professional
>>>> (perhaps also in lower case).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Weishiun
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:04 PM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I like the font for option 4 (perhaps lower cased as Hans mentioned),
>>>> but with the placement of option 6.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That said, either one is fine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Eric Owhadi [mailto:eric.owh...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:02 PM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 option 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Anuradha Hegde [mailto:anuradha.he...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 4:57 PM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 option 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:51 PM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Seems like the dragon logo itself is a winner - most everyone liked
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> But the combined logo and name was definitely not popular.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here are a couple of new suggestions for the combined logo and name.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Option 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4T3o3YVBDakNtQkU/view?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Option 6
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y082OHhNNXBwazA/view?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Don't ask for options 1-3, & 5 - they didn't make it passed my limited
>>>> field testing!
>>>>
>>>> Comments on 4 & 6?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Ken
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan <
>>>> sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I’d say there is enough “curliness” going on with the dragon. So  we
>>>> could try with a simple bold font  . Perhaps with an outline of a different
>>>> color like Hadoop’s/Mahouts is and tie it in with the dragon’s colors as
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Hans Zeller [mailto:hans.zel...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 3:46 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 for the dragon as well. We used to have an informal logo with
>>>> another somewhat cursive font, it shows in one of the carousel pictures on
>>>> the trafodion.apache.org site. That might be better (although still
>>>> not my favorite).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ken Holt <knhknhknh...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> By the way, the size of the example logo is arbitrary.  The original is
>>>> a vector graphics file that will scale up or down with no loss of quality,
>>>> which I will make available when the debate has settled on something.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll make a stab at changing the font and size relative to the dragon
>>>> and post another version of that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agree that separating the dragon from the name/font makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Ken
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 on dragon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Carol Pearson <
>>>> carol.pearson...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 on the Dragon!!!  Looks great!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On the writing, cursive is hard to read, so I'm up for replacing it
>>>> separately.  Maybe we vote on each separately (as Sandhya and Amanda did)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Voting separately is a good idea. Having engineers vote on 'designs' is
>>>> always a tough one. Sounds like folks like the dragon but not the
>>>> cursive... so suggest splitting out what we vote on so at least the dragon
>>>> carries.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Carol P.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Twitter:  @CarolP222
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Sandhya Sundaresan <
>>>> sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for Dragon.
>>>>
>>>> The Trafodion cursive writing and color  -1. IMHO we need to rework the
>>>> writing for sure and try various colors. It’s looking cluttered and
>>>> complicated with the cursive.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Amanda Moran [mailto:amanda.mo...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:13 AM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +10 for dragon! Very cute!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not a huge fan of the cursive writing myself... but if everyone else
>>>> likes... I give it a +0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Christophe LeRouzo <c...@esgyn.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Ken, the standalone dragon looks really good. It complements
>>>> really well the yellow elephant!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> -clr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:53 AM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I like both. I do agree that the font for “Trafodion” makes a’s and o’s
>>>> too much alike. Would be nice to switch to another font that doesn’t have
>>>> that issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:48 AM
>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* Logo Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Apache Trafodion needs a logo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe there was some discussion about a logo for Trafodion quite
>>>> some time ago, but we never really resolved it.  In the very early days of
>>>> Trafodion, before becoming an Apache project (incubating) I devised a logo
>>>> that leveraged the Welsh connection of the project name, and that was a
>>>> simple cute dragon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I now have a much improved version of that original logo and propose
>>>> that we use this as the official Trafodion logo going forward.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dragon standalone -
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4QmttYnBzZDdFSTQ/view?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> Trafodion name & dragon -
>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y3RRdVQwb0owSFU/view?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’m not thrilled with the font choice for “Trafodion” – the o’s and a’s
>>>> look too similar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?  Should we vote on this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Ken
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Amanda Moran
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gunnar
>>>>
>>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gunnar
>>>>
>>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Regards, --Qifan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Regards, --Qifan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gunnar
>>>>
>>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gunnar
>>>>
>>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gunnar
>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Thanks,

Gunnar
*If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*

Reply via email to