Hi,

I think we need to let our contributors in China have a little time to
digest this since they just came back from a weeklong holiday and then we
can do a formal vote later this week.

But yes, right now it looks like 13 and 4g are the top to contenders.

-Carol P.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
Twitter:  @CarolP222
---------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Carol Pearson <carol.pearson...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> ...
>> If we need an official call, that's apache-legal, right St.Ack?  Is it
>> worth it to worry about that?  I saw that Steve's earlier question there
>> hasn't gotten any responses, and I hate to bring up something this trivial
>> for no good reason...
>>
>>
> It would be apache legal, yes. They can be slow sometimes.
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>
>> -Carol P.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
>> Twitter:  @CarolP222
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> 'A' or 'a' doesn't matter I'd say.
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's better to stand out as long as it doesn't violates some rule... :)
>>>> Carol might know the answer to whether lowercase does.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Sean Broeder <sean.broe...@esgyn.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I know there has been some talk of using lower case in Trafodion, but
>>>>> do we want to extend that to Apache?  I’ve done some non-exhaustive
>>>>> searches and can’t find any instance where the leading ‘A’ is not
>>>>> capitalized.  I think we should follow that pattern.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sean
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Gunnar Tapper [mailto:tapper.gun...@gmail.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 12:31 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on the input from several people in this thread, I'd like to
>>>>> propose the following draft as a candidate:
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxlwNhWxn8iTQV85eDlyc0RxWGc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm hoping that Ken, Sandhya, or someone else can make a real version
>>>>> for consideration rather than my PowerPoint hack. It needs a bit of work 
>>>>> on
>>>>> the gray hue (s;lightly darker IMO), size of dragon, and alignment but
>>>>> that's better done in a real designer program. The font was downloaded 
>>>>> from
>>>>> Google Fonts: Telex Regular.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As mentioned, the draft fits into the overall website well:
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxlwNhWxn8iTczNMLTRjYUVXSkE and I'm
>>>>> sure it'll meet the other criteria, too.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gunnar
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Carol Pearson <
>>>>> carol.pearson...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We also need our logo to look good on our customers' and users' and
>>>>> ecosystem denizens' websites so they're eager to show off that Trafodion
>>>>> fits into the puzzle ;-) .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think we're quite converged and ready for a real vote, and to
>>>>> be honest, I hate to call for a 3 day vote on this over a long weekend in
>>>>> the US and at the end of a holiday week in China since that's where most 
>>>>> of
>>>>> our traffic comes from.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Further discussion over the weekend and final vote on Tuesday?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Carol P.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Twitter:  @CarolP222
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Venkat Muthuswamy <
>>>>> venkat.muthusw...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Having Apache in our logo, brings a lot of credibility and shows we
>>>>> are serious.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let’s also keep in mind that the logo/text should look good on the
>>>>> website, presentation slides and any brochures if you will.
>>>>>
>>>>> Certainly we need multiple colors to bring attention to the product
>>>>> name.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Venkat
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Christophe LeRouzo [mailto:c...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 7:59 AM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Cc:* Rohit Jain <rohit.j...@esgyn.com>; Gunnar Tapper <
>>>>> tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems we might need multiple votes:
>>>>>
>>>>> -          One color or multiple colors?
>>>>>
>>>>> -          Thin font or thick font?
>>>>>
>>>>> -          One font or two fonts?
>>>>>
>>>>> -          Apache or not…
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What was Selva saying about engineers and votes? J
>>>>>
>>>>> -clr
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Amanda Moran [mailto:amanda.mo...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 12, 2016 7:21 AM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Cc:* Rohit <rohit.j...@esgyn.com>; Gunnar Tapper <
>>>>> tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -1 all same color.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I still like option 4 the way it was/is but I can understand wanting
>>>>> to remove Apache .... But I still like it the way it is
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 12, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Qifan Chen <qifan.c...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> But is it obvious that Trafodion is an Apache project, if one starts
>>>>> to read about it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Rohit <rohit.j...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It depends on how much value you think Apache adds to Trafodion, as
>>>>> compared to those other logos that perhaps already have some cachet.  I
>>>>> feel that it adds quite a bit of value to Trafodion.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rohit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>>> From: Qifan Chen <qifan.c...@esgyn.com>
>>>>> Date: 02/12/2016 8:34 AM (GMT-06:00)
>>>>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if we could also consider a mod to option 4 where only the
>>>>> dragon and the word trafodion are present. See the two images attached.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I sampled a couple apache project logs and found they do not have the
>>>>> word APACHE in their logos (e.g., HIVE, MONGODB, AVRO, SPARK).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With this approach, it is possible to put the Trafodion logo into the
>>>>> "power by Apache" logo, see URL here
>>>>> <http://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/>, without the
>>>>> duplication of "Apache".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It also simplifies the design and allows a good focus.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks --Qifan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Rohit <rohit.j...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Check out the other logos I sent to the internal dlist.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rohit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>>> From: Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: 02/12/2016 12:50 AM (GMT-06:00)
>>>>> To: user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest that we limit the number of colors used.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A simple change:
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxlwNhWxn8iTT3NNMTZ0dmhqQm8
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gunnar
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Trina Krug <trina.k...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Option 4!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trina
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carol Pearson <carol.pearson...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Slightly late to the party, but +1 on option 4 as well.  Though I
>>>>> would prefer a slightly less formal font, the one in option 6 is too 
>>>>> spaced
>>>>> out and I'm not fond of it overall...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But that's really a nit and this is infinitely better than no logo at
>>>>> all....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Ken!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Carol P.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Twitter:  @CarolP222
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Gunnar Tapper <
>>>>> tapper.gun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither. Keep the font the same for Apache and Trafodion. Bold them
>>>>> both.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan <
>>>>> sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps we should try and see how lowercase with both placements look.
>>>>> The dragon on top looks better to many. We can take votes again J
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Wei-Shiun Tsai [mailto:wei-shiun.t...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:13 PM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for Dave’s and Hans’ suggestion.  Like the dragon to sit on the
>>>>> right, not on top of Trafodion.  But the font in #4 looks more 
>>>>> professional
>>>>> (perhaps also in lower case).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Weishiun
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:04 PM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the font for option 4 (perhaps lower cased as Hans mentioned),
>>>>> but with the placement of option 6.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, either one is fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Eric Owhadi [mailto:eric.owh...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:02 PM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 option 4
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Anuradha Hegde [mailto:anuradha.he...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 4:57 PM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 option 4
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:51 PM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like the dragon logo itself is a winner - most everyone liked
>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the combined logo and name was definitely not popular.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are a couple of new suggestions for the combined logo and name.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Option 4
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4T3o3YVBDakNtQkU/view?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Option 6
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y082OHhNNXBwazA/view?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't ask for options 1-3, & 5 - they didn't make it passed my limited
>>>>> field testing!
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments on 4 & 6?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Ken
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan <
>>>>> sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I’d say there is enough “curliness” going on with the dragon. So  we
>>>>> could try with a simple bold font  . Perhaps with an outline of a 
>>>>> different
>>>>> color like Hadoop’s/Mahouts is and tie it in with the dragon’s colors as
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Hans Zeller [mailto:hans.zel...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 3:46 PM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for the dragon as well. We used to have an informal logo with
>>>>> another somewhat cursive font, it shows in one of the carousel pictures on
>>>>> the trafodion.apache.org site. That might be better (although still
>>>>> not my favorite).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hans
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ken Holt <knhknhknh...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way, the size of the example logo is arbitrary.  The original
>>>>> is a vector graphics file that will scale up or down with no loss of
>>>>> quality, which I will make available when the debate has settled on
>>>>> something.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll make a stab at changing the font and size relative to the dragon
>>>>> and post another version of that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Agree that separating the dragon from the name/font makes sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Ken
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 on dragon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Carol Pearson <
>>>>> carol.pearson...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 on the Dragon!!!  Looks great!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On the writing, cursive is hard to read, so I'm up for replacing it
>>>>> separately.  Maybe we vote on each separately (as Sandhya and Amanda did)?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Voting separately is a good idea. Having engineers vote on 'designs'
>>>>> is always a tough one. Sounds like folks like the dragon but not the
>>>>> cursive... so suggest splitting out what we vote on so at least the dragon
>>>>> carries.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Carol P.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Email:    carol.pearson...@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Twitter:  @CarolP222
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Sandhya Sundaresan <
>>>>> sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for Dragon.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Trafodion cursive writing and color  -1. IMHO we need to rework
>>>>> the writing for sure and try various colors. It’s looking cluttered and
>>>>> complicated with the cursive.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Amanda Moran [mailto:amanda.mo...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:13 AM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +10 for dragon! Very cute!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not a huge fan of the cursive writing myself... but if everyone else
>>>>> likes... I give it a +0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Christophe LeRouzo <c...@esgyn.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Ken, the standalone dragon looks really good. It complements
>>>>> really well the yellow elephant!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> -clr
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:53 AM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I like both. I do agree that the font for “Trafodion” makes a’s and
>>>>> o’s too much alike. Would be nice to switch to another font that doesn’t
>>>>> have that issue.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:48 AM
>>>>> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org
>>>>> *Subject:* Logo Proposal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache Trafodion needs a logo.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe there was some discussion about a logo for Trafodion quite
>>>>> some time ago, but we never really resolved it.  In the very early days of
>>>>> Trafodion, before becoming an Apache project (incubating) I devised a logo
>>>>> that leveraged the Welsh connection of the project name, and that was a
>>>>> simple cute dragon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I now have a much improved version of that original logo and propose
>>>>> that we use this as the official Trafodion logo going forward.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dragon standalone -
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4QmttYnBzZDdFSTQ/view?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>> Trafodion name & dragon -
>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y3RRdVQwb0owSFU/view?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not thrilled with the font choice for “Trafodion” – the o’s and
>>>>> a’s look too similar.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?  Should we vote on this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Ken
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Amanda Moran
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gunnar
>>>>>
>>>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gunnar
>>>>>
>>>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, --Qifan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, --Qifan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gunnar
>>>>>
>>>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Gunnar
>>>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to