Several different issues here. There is no "job completion cap", rather
there is a limit on how long an individual work item will be allowed to
process before it is labeled a timeout. The default number of such errors +
exceptions before a Job is stopped is 15. Please increase this cap if you
expect a work item to go longer.

If a job process runs out of heap space it should go OOM at which point
unpredictable things will happen.  Do you see OOM exceptions in the JP
logfiles?

As for a bug, it is still hard to understand what is happening. Newer
versions of DUCC include a ducc_gather_logs command that collects DUCC
daemon logfiles and state and makes it more likely we can understand what
is happening. No user application logfiles are included in the captured tar
file.

Regards,
Eddie

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:33 AM, priyank sharma <priyank.sha...@orkash.com>
wrote:

> Yes, i am using DUCC v2.0.1 i have a three node cluster with 32gb ram,
> 40gb ram and 28gb ram. Job runs fine for 15-20 days after that it goes into
> the infinite loop with the same batch of the id's. We have a 75 minutes cap
> for a job to complete if not then its start again so after every 75 minutes
> new job starts but with the same id batch as previous and not even a single
> document ingested in the data store it goes in the same state untill we
> restarts the server.
>
> Is this because of the DUCC v2.0.1, are this version of DUCC having that
> bug?
>
> Is this problem occur because of the Java Heap Space?
>
> Please suggest something as there are nothing in the logs regarding to my
> problem.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Priyank Sharma
>
> On Friday 10 November 2017 09:00 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote:
>
>> Hi Priyank,
>>
>> Looks like you are running DUCC v2.0.x. There are so many bugs fixed in
>> subsequent versions, the latest being v2.2.1. Newer versions have a
>> ducc_update command that will upgrade an existing install, but given all
>> the changes since v2.0.x I suggest a clean install.
>>
>> Eddie
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:11 AM, priyank sharma <
>> priyank.sha...@orkash.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> There is nothing on the work item page and performance page on the web
>>> server. There is only one log file for the main node, no log files for
>>> other two nodes. Ducc job processes not able to pick the data from the
>>> data
>>> source and no UIMA aggregator is working for that batches.
>>>
>>> Are the issue because of the java heap space? We are giving 4gb ram to
>>> the
>>> job-process.
>>>
>>> Attaching the Log file.
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards
>>> Priyank Sharma
>>>
>>> On Thursday 09 November 2017 04:33 PM, Lou DeGenaro wrote:
>>>
>>> The first place to look is in your job's logs.  Visit the ducc-mon jobs
>>>> page ducchost:42133/jobs.jsp then click on the id of your job.  Examine
>>>> the
>>>> logs by clicking on each log file name looking for any revealing
>>>> information.
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to post non-confidential snippets here, or If you'd like to
>>>> chat
>>>> in real time we can use hipchat.
>>>>
>>>> Lou.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:19 AM, priyank sharma <
>>>> priyank.sha...@orkash.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All!
>>>>
>>>>> I have a problem regarding DUCC cluster in which a job process gets
>>>>> stuck
>>>>> and keeps on processing the same batch again and again due to maximum
>>>>> duration the batch gets reason or extraordinary status
>>>>> *"**CanceledByUser"
>>>>> *and then gets restarted with the same ID's. This usually happens after
>>>>> 15
>>>>> to 20 days and goes away after restarting the ducc cluster. While going
>>>>> through the data store that is being used by CAS consumer to ingest
>>>>> data,
>>>>> the data regarding this batch does never get ingested. So most probably
>>>>> this data is not being processed.
>>>>>
>>>>> How to check if this data is being processed or not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are the resources the issue and why it is being processed after
>>>>> restarting
>>>>> the cluster?
>>>>>
>>>>> We have three nodes cluster with  32gb ram, 40gb ram and 28 gb ram.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>> Priyank Sharma
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Reply via email to