Hi there: On 23 Dec 2011, at 17:27, Mike Sullivan <mike.sulli...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 12/23/11 09:20, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> >> We didn't get all the existing isaexec usage in the WOS removed after the >> 32-bit >> kernel EOF - perhaps another bug should be filed to make Userland consistent >> and >> non-isaexec'ed in all the areas that ship 32-bit & 64-bit versions still, or >> to >> drop 32-bit versions where both are shipped and only one is needed (like >> top). As part of the ksh93 migration to userland from ON, I've made the isaexec migration as well (both 32 bit and 64 bit are delivered and linked to isaexec via /usr/bin/ksh). Would it seem sensible to file a suitable bug against ksh93 (removing the isaexec) and resolve it as part of the migration? Cheers, Edwin Beasant _______________________________________________ userland-discuss mailing list userland-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
