Is there any kind of error in the log; or do both brokers just become the master?
On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
March 8th and used the following url http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activemq-4.1.1-RC1/maven2/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1.1/ James.Strachan wrote: > > On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Iam using mysql 5.1 and it seems like master slave lock issue is still >> not >> fixed on 4.1.1 latest snapshot. would appreciate any feedback from >> activemq >> guys. > > Which date of the 4.1-SNAPSHOT did you try? > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2354.html#a9474993 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
