On 4/24/07, Daniel Gradecak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW thats really intended for folks who are using the JMS API directly > rather than JmsTemplate > So for better performances it is better to use the API directly ?
Yes
> No you can't. JmsTemplate creates/closes all the JMS resources each > time so you're only hope is to use only sending along with > PooledConnectionFactory, or Jencks I didnt really get. Do you mean that as I configured it, it will be done by Jencks out of the box, or should I use directly the JcaPooledConnectionFactory without using JmsTemplate ? Sorry for my not understanding :) It is just that after too much readings sometimes I cant see the finger in front of my nose. I would just like to be sure I am not doing it wrong.
I totally understand. Unfortunately the JMS API is kinda complex; particulary when it comes to pooling as there are various options and issues to consider. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
