Hi Sean, Curious to know the average message size used and whether you used the default broker configuration?
Thanks, Joe www.ttmsolutions.com Sean Bastille-2 wrote: > > I guess my first message was too long, but that's alright, I ended up > getting the answers I needed. I figured I should let you guys in on the > results of my testing. > > The summary of my initial write up is that my main requirement is message > throughput per host, so that is what my testing has been focused. The > bottom line is that I was able to sent 4500 messages/sec between two hosts > using 3 producer processes and 2 consumer processes each using embedded > brokers. That is the highest sustained throughput I was able to achieve, > and while it was successful, the 2 consumers were consuming ~80% of the > CPU > on the host (2 2.4G Xeons with HT enabled) leaving little available for my > processing of the messages. Interestingly enough, the 3 producers were > consuming ~60% of the CPU on the other host. > > As a sanity check, I compared a standalone broker to embedded brokers in a > 1:1 configuration. The standalone maxed out around 1800/sec, and the > embedded brokers sustained 2500/sec, so this looks like it might be a more > capable configuration. > > Unfortunately, none of this works for our requirements. To handle our > current load on existing hardware we need to support at least 8000/sec, > and > to allow for future growth, I'd really want 15-20k. > > -Sean > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/High-message-rate-research-tp15318063s2354p15417390.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
