have you looked at the failover transport? see: http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html with the backup=true option, a connection to all listed brokers will be created so that they are in hot standby in the event that the first connection is dropped. In this way, failover can be very fast.
2009/1/29 kaykay <kaykay.uni...@gmail.com>: > > This thread is old but just curious if there has been a recent update of this > w.r.t ActiveMQ 5.2 . The problem that I am trying to solve is similar where > a consumer listens to multiple brokers (as a failover redundancy issue > instead of listening to a single broker). > > > Stepan Koltsov wrote: >> >> I'm playing with 5.0. >> >> How do you think, is it hard to write new Transport that consumes from >> multiple brokers? >> >> S. >> >> >> ttmdev wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I got similar results in my consumer testing. What version of AMQ >>> are you using? >>> >>> Your only recourse may be to multi thread your consumer and have it >>> create a connection to each of the brokers. >>> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Single-consumer-for-multiple-brokers--tp15768836p21729358.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source SOA http://FUSESource.com
