Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira issue. I just updated that page to fix the order. That page was produced before schema validation was enabled. As the broker element is a sequence, order is important.
You can see the xml schema at http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html 2009/3/31 ee7arh <andrew.hu...@2e-systems.com> > > > Hi, > > I had a very similar problem except that ActiveMQ complained because my > <persistenceAdapter> was declared after my <transportConnectors>. > > When I put the <persistenceAdapter> first then all worked fine. What is > confusing is that on the ActiveMQ docs it has an example showing that this > will work the other way around: > > http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html > http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html > > Is this actually a bug in ActiveMQ? Should I raise an issue? > > Thanks > Andrew > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p22804988.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source SOA http://FUSESource.com
