Thanks Andrew!
On 6 May 2009, at 15:33, ee7arh wrote:
Please also fix this page too:
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
Order should be:
networkConnectors
persistenceAdapter
transportConnectors
Bregards
Andrew
Gary Tully wrote:
Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira issue. I just updated
that page
to fix the order. That page was produced before schema validation was
enabled. As the broker element is a sequence, order is important.
You can see the xml schema at
http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html
2009/3/31 ee7arh <andrew.hu...@2e-systems.com>
Hi,
I had a very similar problem except that ActiveMQ complained
because my
<persistenceAdapter> was declared after my <transportConnectors>.
When I put the <persistenceAdapter> first then all worked fine.
What is
confusing is that on the ActiveMQ docs it has an example showing
that
this
will work the other way around:
http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
Is this actually a bug in ActiveMQ? Should I raise an issue?
Thanks
Andrew
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p22804988.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source SOA
http://FUSESource.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p23407600.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
