Hi. I'm using AMQ 5.2 (apache-activemq-5.2.0-bin.tar). The camel code is in a java class of my own package (cl.niclabs.activemq.camel), loaded at the startup in the AMQ's xml config with this code:
<camelContext id="camel" xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring";> <package>cl.niclabs.activemq.camel</package> </camelContext> You can download my configs here: http://www.nabble.com/file/p22815567/activemq-tests.tar.gz activemq-tests.tar.gz So, you say that using JMS transactions should rise the camel routing performance near the VirtualDestination one, that's all? Thanks for your time. James.Strachan wrote: > > Which version of ActiveMQ/Camel/Spring are you using? Is the camel > code inside the broker? Do you have any specific spring configuration > for the ActiveMQ component? > > BTW the out of the box won't be using transactions, so you'll be doing > a request/reply with the broker (I presume using TCP unless you've > some custom config) waiting for the send to hit disk for each > destination before committing the consume. So using a JMS transaction > should speed that up hugely. > > However fast we get the camel code; topics and virtual queues are > always gonna be faster; since on the broker side its just moving an in > memory message to multiple destinations in a single thread without the > overhead of going through the JMS client API. > > Having said that - if you are testing like for like (e.g. using VM > transport, using transactions & using async sends) it should get > close. > > > 2009/3/31 DanielR <romero...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hi. >> >> >> Im getting very slow performance using camel based routing. >> >> I have 1 producer sending messages to QUEUE.COLOR and then ActiveMQ >> duplicate the messages to QUEUE.BLUE and QUEUE.RED (except for >> topics...). >> >> >> Is this normal? >> >> >> My tests: >> >> 1. Camel Route defined in XML >> 2. Camel Route defined in RouteBuilder Plugin >> 3. VirtualDestination Routing >> 4. Topics >> >> Test N° 1 2 3 4 >> Body Size >> 128B 703 763 6377 10590 >> 512B 670 692 5872 8143 >> 1KB 628 635 5037 4749 >> 2KB 566 557 2376 2641 >> >> *messages/second >> >> >> Camel Route defined in XML Code >> >> <camelContext id="camel" >> xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring";> >> <route> >> <from uri="activemq:QUEUE.COLOR" /> >> <to uri="activemq:QUEUE.RED" /> >> <to uri="activemq:QUEUE.BLUE" /> >> </route> >> </camelContext> >> >> >> Camel Route defined in RouteBuilder Plugin Code >> >> class MyRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder { >> >> �...@override >> public void configure() throws Exception { >> >> >> from("activemq:queue:QUEUE.COLOR").to("activemq:queue:QUEUE.RED").to("activemq:queue:QUEUE.BLUE"); >> } >> >> } >> >> VirtualDestination Code >> >> <destinationInterceptors> >> <virtualDestinationInterceptor> >> <virtualDestinations> >> <compositeQueue >> name="QUEUE.COLOR"> >> <forwardTo> >> <queue >> physicalName="QUEUE.RED" /> >> <queue >> physicalName="QUEUE.BLUE" /> >> </forwardTo> >> </compositeQueue> >> </virtualDestinations> >> </virtualDestinationInterceptor> >> </destinationInterceptors> >> >> >> >> >> Graphic with results attached. >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Daniel Romero P. >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22812467/activemq-routing.jpg >> activemq-routing.jpg >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Camel-routing-poor-performance-vs-VirtualDestinations-and-Topics-tp22812467p22812467.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Camel-routing-poor-performance-vs-VirtualDestinations-and-Topics-tp22812467p22815567.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
