Also configuring the activemq component to use vm transport (as it defaults to tcp://locahost:61616) would probably help too
2009/3/31 DanielR <romero...@gmail.com>: > > Hi. > > I'm using AMQ 5.2 (apache-activemq-5.2.0-bin.tar). > The camel code is in a java class of my own package > (cl.niclabs.activemq.camel), loaded at the startup in the AMQ's xml config > with this code: > > <camelContext id="camel" > xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring"> > <package>cl.niclabs.activemq.camel</package> > </camelContext> > > You can download my configs here: > http://www.nabble.com/file/p22815567/activemq-tests.tar.gz > activemq-tests.tar.gz > > > So, you say that using JMS transactions should rise the camel routing > performance near the VirtualDestination one, that's all? > > Thanks for your time. > > > > > James.Strachan wrote: >> >> Which version of ActiveMQ/Camel/Spring are you using? Is the camel >> code inside the broker? Do you have any specific spring configuration >> for the ActiveMQ component? >> >> BTW the out of the box won't be using transactions, so you'll be doing >> a request/reply with the broker (I presume using TCP unless you've >> some custom config) waiting for the send to hit disk for each >> destination before committing the consume. So using a JMS transaction >> should speed that up hugely. >> >> However fast we get the camel code; topics and virtual queues are >> always gonna be faster; since on the broker side its just moving an in >> memory message to multiple destinations in a single thread without the >> overhead of going through the JMS client API. >> >> Having said that - if you are testing like for like (e.g. using VM >> transport, using transactions & using async sends) it should get >> close. >> >> >> 2009/3/31 DanielR <romero...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> >>> Im getting very slow performance using camel based routing. >>> >>> I have 1 producer sending messages to QUEUE.COLOR and then ActiveMQ >>> duplicate the messages to QUEUE.BLUE and QUEUE.RED (except for >>> topics...). >>> >>> >>> Is this normal? >>> >>> >>> My tests: >>> >>> 1. Camel Route defined in XML >>> 2. Camel Route defined in RouteBuilder Plugin >>> 3. VirtualDestination Routing >>> 4. Topics >>> >>> Test N° 1 2 3 4 >>> Body Size >>> 128B 703 763 6377 10590 >>> 512B 670 692 5872 8143 >>> 1KB 628 635 5037 4749 >>> 2KB 566 557 2376 2641 >>> >>> *messages/second >>> >>> >>> Camel Route defined in XML Code >>> >>> <camelContext id="camel" >>> xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring"> >>> <route> >>> <from uri="activemq:QUEUE.COLOR" /> >>> <to uri="activemq:QUEUE.RED" /> >>> <to uri="activemq:QUEUE.BLUE" /> >>> </route> >>> </camelContext> >>> >>> >>> Camel Route defined in RouteBuilder Plugin Code >>> >>> class MyRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder { >>> >>> �...@override >>> public void configure() throws Exception { >>> >>> >>> from("activemq:queue:QUEUE.COLOR").to("activemq:queue:QUEUE.RED").to("activemq:queue:QUEUE.BLUE"); >>> } >>> >>> } >>> >>> VirtualDestination Code >>> >>> <destinationInterceptors> >>> <virtualDestinationInterceptor> >>> <virtualDestinations> >>> <compositeQueue >>> name="QUEUE.COLOR"> >>> <forwardTo> >>> <queue >>> physicalName="QUEUE.RED" /> >>> <queue >>> physicalName="QUEUE.BLUE" /> >>> </forwardTo> >>> </compositeQueue> >>> </virtualDestinations> >>> </virtualDestinationInterceptor> >>> </destinationInterceptors> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Graphic with results attached. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Daniel Romero P. >>> >>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22812467/activemq-routing.jpg >>> activemq-routing.jpg >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Camel-routing-poor-performance-vs-VirtualDestinations-and-Topics-tp22812467p22812467.html >>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> James >> ------- >> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source Integration >> http://fusesource.com/ >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Camel-routing-poor-performance-vs-VirtualDestinations-and-Topics-tp22812467p22815567.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/