It is possible for one broker to handle many producers and consumers. And given adequate resources and proper tuning, I think you'll be surprised as to the number of consumers and producers one broker can handle.
Joe http://www.ttmsolutions.com niko_dim wrote: > > Hi, > > I have an application which is running on different JVM-s. In some > cases the application needs to send messages to all other applications > which are running in this network. The load of these messages is not high > but from time to time I can expect 15-20 messages/sec. I tried to use > ActiveMQ clustering and started one ActiveMQ broker on each JVM. To > simulated broadcast I am using a topic and on each JVM I have one producer > and one consumer. The scenario works pretty well with 5 brokers running on > 5 JVM-s but I do not know what will happened if I have to run 200 brokers > running on 200 JVM-s. Is it possible to run 500 brokers ? I am not able to > test such huge setup but need to know if such huge cluster is > theoretically possible and what kind of problems I can expect ? > > I also have a scenario where I need to send a message to a concrete JVM. > For this scenario I am using a queue and receivers with specific selector > on each JVM. This again is working with 5 brokers but do not know what > will happened if the number of brokers dramatically increases. > > It is possible to use only one broker and to remotely connect all > producers and consumers to this broker. Do you think that this is a better > setup ? > > > Thanks for the help! > Nikodim. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-run-huge-number-of-ActiveMQ-brokers-in-a-cluster---tp26727780p26727929.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
