Hi Seb,
I tried out the 5.3.1-SNAPSHOT from Jan 28 (which is the latest I could just
download) and the behavior is the same,
so if I will not get further replay to this thread I will open a bug in the
issue tracker.

Thanks,
Mark


Sebastian Rodriguez-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> There is a memory leak solved in the 5.3.1 branch (
> AMQ-2448<https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2448> )
> that occurs when using network of brokers.
> It doesn't seem it's exactly your test case, as the two brokers are
> apparently up during your test.
> Maybe you give a try to the 5.3.1 trunk version and check if you still
> have
> the memory leak.
> 
> If this doesn't solve your problem, a code sample reproducing the memory
> leak would be useful.
> Thank you very much,
> Seb
> 
> On 4 February 2010 08:26, mark.w <m.wu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have a following test scenario: I start two brokers (ver. 5.3.0) on
>> local
>> host on two different ports, lets say broker A on port 61616 an B on
>> 61617.
>> In broker A I configure additionally a networkConnector with
>> uri="static://(tcp://localhost:61617)".
>> If both instances are started I run a unit test that creates a topic
>> subscription to B and close the connection afterwards.
>>
>> I noticed that in broker A (create a heapdump and analyze it with MAT)
>> after
>> each test run two objects of type
>> org.apache.activemq.command.ConsumerInfo
>> (in the destination.physicalName I see my topic) stay for ever.
>> I tried also to set dynamicOnly=true option, but it does not change the
>> behavior.
>>
>> Is this a known memory leak?
>>
>> Thanks in advance and best regards,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Memory-leak-while-running-a-network-of-brokers--tp27445873p27445873.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sebastien Rodriguez
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Memory-leak-while-running-a-network-of-brokers--tp27445873p27450763.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to