can you try your test case against a 5.4-SNAPSHOT?

On 26 July 2010 10:47, honno <hon...@163.com> wrote:
>
> HI,all.
> I use failover transport to connect to brokerA and brokerB.The brokerA and
> brokerB use a networkConnector to connect each other.
>
> But i found the brokerA has a duplicate message when restart brokerA or
> brokerB.
>
> The test case as follow:
>
> (1)start brokerA,brokerB,start producer and consumer,sending 100000 messages
> by producer.
> (2)stop brokerA, restart brokerA after 5 seconds
> (3)stop brokerB,  restart brokerB after 5 seconds
> (4)stop brokerA, restart brokerA after 5 seconds
> (5)stop brokerB,  restart brokerB after 5 seconds
> (6)stop brokerA, restart brokerA after 5 seconds
> (7)stop brokerB,  restart brokerB after 5 seconds
>
> After the producer sends all messages(100000),the consumer receives all
> messages,But i find the brokerA
> has a message which cannot be consumed by the consumer and the message is a
> duplicate message which has bean consumed by the consumer.
>
> When i restart the consumer or start another consumer ,the consumer or the
> another consumer will receive the duplicate messsage.
>
> I use the version 5.3.2 .And i find the 5.3.2 and 5.3.0 has the same
> problem(having duplicate message),but the 5.2.0 is OK.
>
> So is this  a bug of ActiveMQ 5.3.2?
>
> the brokerA config :
>
>       <networkConnectors>
>            <networkConnector uri="static:(tcp://localhost:61617)" />
>        </networkConnectors>
>
> the brokerB  config :
>       <networkConnectors>
>            <networkConnector uri="static:(tcp://localhost:61616)" />
>        </networkConnectors>
>
> the client uri :
>     failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://localhost:61617)?randomize=false
>
> thanks.
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Having-Duplicate-message--when-using-failover-and-networkConnector-.-tp29264762p29264762.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to