What is a connection url you're using?
Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:56 PM, activeMqUser <manoranjan.si...@connectm.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > i am facing a problem while implementing FailOver in activeMQ. > I have 3 Brokers. Where i have made one Network by enabling > > <networkConnectors> > <networkConnector name="Network-Broker" > > uri="static:(failover:(tcp://localhost:5001,tcp://localhost:5002)?randomize=false)" > dynamicOnly="true" > networkTTL="3" > duplex="true"/> > </networkConnectors> > > and other two are stand alone. > > My Network broker is running on 5009 port. I started all the Brokers one by > one(first 5001 then 5002 and then 5009). So as expected the Network Broker > which is running on 5009 is successfully connected to the Broker running on > 5001 as i can confirm from the below stack. > > INFO | Establishing network connection from vm://amq3 to > failover:(tcp://localhost:5001,tcp://localhost:5002)?randomize=false > INFO | Connector vm://amq3 Started > INFO | Successfully connected to tcp://localhost:5001 > INFO | Network Connector Network-Broker Started > > I am starting My Application which will create One producer and consumer by > connecting to the Network Broker which is running on 5009 port. > My requirement is when i stop the Network Broker to which my Application is > connected on 5009 it should try to connect to either Broker on 5001 or 5002 > and my Application should not fail. Currently what is happening is, my > Application is trying to connect to the Broker reconnect to 5009 port which > is not available , so it is keep on trying. Is it possible that as i have a > Network of Broker(5009 , 5001 , 5002) My application will reconnect to > either 5001 or 5002 ? > > I am not sure if "what i am looking for is supported or not". If i have > understood the concept of FailOver then please correct me. > > But this is my requirement. If you can suggest a better approach i will be > more happy to see that. > > Thanks in advance > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failover-problem-tp2537292p2537292.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
