"I think this part of the spec is terrible." >> It does leave a lot to be desired.
"It is so vague you can do nothing to order by priority and still claim compliance. " >>I agree it is vague, but my interpretation is that "something" must be implemented. Examine this statement, "it should do its best to deliver expedited messages ahead of normal messages". I would hope that the JMS implementers would interpret this as some type of algorithm must be in place to expedite messages with higher priority, and if there isn't one then the implementation is not meeting compliancy. That is, if nothing is done, then the implementation is NOT doing its best to deliver expedited messages ahead of normal messages. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSPriority-implemented-in-AMQ-5-4-1-tp3162256p3162340.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
