----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
> 
> this seems like a normal operation, as a message
> on ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempQueue indicates that temp queue has been
> created/destroyed.
> 
> Where do you see those messages? Are you subscribed to that topic?

no, even once I am done with the topic they continue.  

Just to be clear when I say 'completely flooded' I mean > 1 million
advisories per minute with my network cards showing over 10 meg bit 
dedicated just to this advisory message.  It cant be normal :)





> 
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
> -----------------
> The experts in open source integration and messaging -
> http://fusesource.com
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:23 PM, R.I.Pienaar <r...@devco.net> wrote:
> 
> > hello
> >
> > I wish to use temp topics (or queues) in a network of brokers
> >
> > At the most basic level this works fine:
> >
> > I subscribe to /temp-topic/foo in my stomp client.
> > I send a message with that in the reply-to header
> >
> > On the remote I see reply to translated into
> > /remote-temp-queue/ID:monitor2.xx.net-59626-1320978211687-5:3572:1
> > and that all works fine.
> >
> > Immediately after though all the brokers on my network gets
> > completely
> > flooded with advisories on ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempQueue:
> >
> > for example:
> >
> > {"DestinationInfo": {
> >  "commandId": 0,
> >  "responseRequired": false,
> >  "connectionId": {
> >    "value": "ID:monitor2.xx.net-53069-1321036534768-16:2"
> >  },
> >  "destination": {
> >    "@class": "ActiveMQTempQueue",
> >    "string": "ID:monitor2.xx.net-53069-1321036534768-5:33:2",
> >    "null": {}
> >  },
> >  "operationType": 1,
> >  "timeout": 0
> > }}
> >
> > My brokers are a->b->c so I have a TTL of 2 on the network
> > connections.
> >
> > Can anyone provide any hints on what I might do to improve the
> > situation
> > with
> > temp queues or topics on networks of brokers?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > --
> > R.I.Pienaar
> >
> 

-- 
R.I.Pienaar

Reply via email to