Does level db have support for that scheduled persistent store? http://activemq.apache.org/delay-and-schedule-message-delivery.html
Or maybe I am mistaking or remembering wrong that the scheduler has a separate store from the regular store for its scheduled messages. On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > of the ~3k unit tests - many use the default store and we have not > switched the default store. Until we do, and work through any issues > we won't know for sure. We plan to do that before we make it the > default. > The only known caveat atm is priority support, levelDb does not > respect JMS priority in the same way as kahaDB or JDBC does. > > On 22 October 2013 15:25, Paul Gale <paul.n.g...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Per Claus Ibsen's blog post: >> >> "Over time level db is planned to be default out of the box persistent >> store, instead of the current kahadb store. Though we are not there >> yet, so kahadb is still the default store." >> >> What does "we are not there yet" mean? What are the caveats regarding >> LevelDB usage? >> >> Copious detail is much appreciated. >> >> Just wondering. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul > > > > -- > http://redhat.com > http://blog.garytully.com -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
