Cool! I think broker level at a minimum but I imagine having both on the destination level would be good too.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5624 On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > This sounds like a useful feature; submit an Enhancement in JIRA for it... > > Were you looking for a broker-level count (count of slow consumers on all > destinations) or a destination-level count? Or both? (Implementing both > seems most useful to me, and not particularly hard to do.) > > Tim > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > > > According to this: > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/jmx.html > > > > There are no simple metrics for the number of slow consumers. > > > > Is there an easy way to figure this out? > > > > Would be nice for monitoring systems so that alerts can be triggered. > > > > Right now you have to enumerate each subscriber but it takes 200ms for > each > > one so it could take a rather long time. > > > > Plus, it’s better to have something O(1) for monitoring systems vs > > something O(N) which might take a rather long time. > > -- > > > > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > > … or check out my Google+ profile > > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > > <http://spinn3r.com> > > > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
