I’m trying to improve our ActiveMQ message throughput and I’m not really seeing the performance I would expect.
We moved from non-persistent to persistent (which would be more ideal) and the performance is about 4-5x slower than before. I think this would be somewhat reasonable but our disks aren’t really at 100% utilization and they’re on SSD. They’re only at about 5% utilization. So perhaps instead of ONE ActiveMQ node on a 16 core box it might be more beneficial to use say 4 or 8 ? (maybe putting them in containers). Granted this would require a TON of work right now, but that might be the best way to go (in theory). Kevin -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
