I would like to see a test working on activemq 5. And we could then figure out how it was implemented
Last time I checked it was the same. But for someone provide me a working test I will figure out how it works. -- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone. > On Oct 31, 2015, at 10:43, Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > > ActiveMQ supports your use case. Artemis apparently does not, though I'd > love to hear why not. I can't speak for other JMS providers since I > haven't used them; you'd need to investigate them on a case-by-case basis > rather than making the blanket assumption that they don't. >> On Oct 31, 2015 8:08 AM, "ohsgx" <ohs...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thank you for your reply. >> I already 'redistribution-delay' configuration. >> >> If consumer B connect to Node A, consumer B get all producing messages >> produced down time (they remain node A queue). I can't understand this >> situation. There is no consistency. Artemis doesn't support message >> redistribute(or redelivery) in cluster environment? Other MQ also doesn't >> support this case? >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/artemis-cluster-don-t-redistribute-message-tp4703503p4703567.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>
