Yes, a shared filesystem is the standard way to do master/slave with KahaDB, and it can be done with brokers on different hosts as long as all brokers have read/write access to the data directory. Just be sure you understand that in a master/slave cluster, one and only one of the brokers (the master) is active at a time, and the others (the slaves) are sitting idle waiting for the master to fail so they can become the master. So the brokers aren't sharing the data directory in the sense of both using it at once, just in the sense that one can take over exclusive use of it if the other fails.
Tim On May 6, 2016 10:19 AM, "srikanth.april30" <srikanth.apri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi ActiveMq Team, > I am working on a POC related to ActiveMq. Does the Master/Slave concept is > achievable with two ActiveMQ instances (one in local machine and other in > remote machine) ? > > Please help me with some information . > > Thanks > Srikanth > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/can-we-share-the-data-folder-of-activemq-between-two-machines-local-and-remote-tp4711666.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
