Hi Clebert,

this was just because I did not know that there is a new and an old format.

I changed it to the new format and everything works fine, with and without
cluster.

Thank you!

Kind Regards,
Andreas

PS: config looks like this, now:

    <addresses>
         <address name="ttt.test.queue">
            <anycast>
               <queue name="ttt.test.queue">
                   <durable>true</durable>
               </queue>
            </anycast>
         </address>
      </addresses>



On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Why don't you use the new format...
>
>
> the <queues> exist for backward compatibility:
>
>
> <addresses>
>    <address name="test.queue">
>       <anycast>
>          <queue name="test.queue"/>
>       </anycast>
>    </address>
>    <address name="exampleQueue">
>       <anycast>
>          <queue name="exampleQueue"/>
>       </anycast>
>    </address>
> </addresses>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:11 AM, andi welchlin <andi.welch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have configured one queue in Artemis which is durable.
> > I sent a durable message to this queue and would have expected to see
> this
> > message even if the consumer connects later than the message was
> published.
> > But this is not the case in my test.
> >
> > I configured the queue like:
> >
> >  <queues>
> >        <queue name="awe.test.queue">
> >           <address>awe.test.queue</address>
> >           <durable>true</durable>
> >         </queue>
> >     </queues>
> >
> >
> > ... and sent a message using durable with AMQP 1.0 using the qpid-sender
> > from qpid cpp package.
> >
> > qpid-send -b localhost:9800 -a awe.test.queue
> > '--connection-option={protocol:amqp1.0}' --content-string 'test message
> Di
> > 12. Dez 09:32:47 CET 2017' --durable=yes
> >
> >
> > As long as the receiver is connected it receives the message but when it
> > joins later, then nothing happens.
> >
> > Did I miss some point in my configuration?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Andreas
> >
> > PS: Test was done using only one broker.
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Reply via email to